|
PEACE
Peace is not a thing of weakness.
It calls for heroism and action.
Day by day you must
wrest it from the
mouths of liars.
You must stand alone
against the multitude; for
clamor is always
on the side of the many, and the
liar has ever the first word.
The meek must be strong.
~Stefan Zioeig~
WHY WE MUST WAGE PEACE
Professor Roland G. Simbulan
Professor, University of the Philippines
& Co-Convenor,
Gathering for Peace
If liberty means anything at
all,
it means the right to tell people
what they do not want to
hear."
-George Orwell
As you are reading this, the United States is
feverishly preparing to launch a war of aggression against another
sovereign state, Iraq. Since the September 11, 2001 attack on
the very symbols of U.S. imperial domination, the Bush
administration has exploited to its full advantage the grief and
outrage of the American people not only to engage in a campaign of
repression at home, including the wholesale assault on its own
Constitution's Bill of Rights and racial profiling. It is using the
memory of September 11 to reassert its economic, political and
military dominance of the world by destroying anything that stands
in its way, branding anyone -- country, group or individuals -- who
disagree with it as "terrorists" or "terrorist-coddlers".
Now, a major war of aggression against Iraq is being prepared
using Bush's "doctrine of preemptive war". This violates the
very essence of international law and the UN Charter which forbids
countries from waging war except as an act of self-defense. This
"preemption" is in reality a cover to justify the United States'
post-Cold War foreign policy of armed aggression against any
country, group or leader that stands in its way. Not satisfied with
"liberating" Afghanistan for the U.S. oil and gas industry that now
dominates his Cabinet, Bush and the oil and gas industry that he now
convenes at the White House, have now trained their eyes on the rich
oil fields and resources of Iraq and are planning to liberate it for
the expansion of U.S. oil and gas industries which dominate the
production and distribution of this vital "black gold" in Saudi
Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Kuwait.
The world is in shock at Bush's attempts to cajole and use
the United Nations (UN) as an instrument of war and aggression
rather than as an instrument for peace as it was mandated when it
was founded. The UN should resist any attempt to transform it into
the instrument of the United States' foreign policy of "preemption".
Otherwise, this would open the world to wars and conflicts based on
"preemption" justified on the basis of a particular country's
perception (of being attacked in the near future) though it has not
actually been attacked. Imagine if Iraq were to use that doctrine
for itself right now.
America's war with Iraq has been going on these past 12
years. Since 1991, it has continuously bombed Baghdad and
other major Iraqi cities and towns, causing what it calls
"collateral damage" to tens of thousands of Iraqi
civilians--especially women and children. UNICEF and International
Red Cross statistics report that, "aside from the 200,000 Iraqis
slaughtered during the 1991 Gulf War, an additional 1.5 million
civilians have died since 1991 as a result of economic sanctions, of
which 600,000 are children under 5 years of age."
The US, under both the leadership of the Democratic and
Republican parties of the United States has, since 1991 declared "no
fly zones" in many parts of Iraq, meaning, any Iraqi aircraft flying
over that country's own territory will be shot down by the more
superior F-16 or F-15 American fighter planes. In the 11 years of
"peace" since Feb. 1991, an additional 400 tons of bombs have been
dropped on Iraq in US-UK-French bombing raids, killing and wounding
hundreds of Iraqi civilians. The United States' policy of
economic and trade sanctions these past ten years have further
caused the deaths and starvation of countless Iraqi people.
We are no lovers of Saddam Hussein. He may be a tyrant
or humans rights violator to his own people (as Bush is turning out
to be in implementing the USA PATRIOT ACT against the American
people), but Iraq is a sovereign nation. Saddam may be a genocidal
maniac to the Kurds in Iraq, but Iraq is also a member of the United
Nations. The United Nations is SUPPOSED to be an organization for
Peace, not for War.
But again, lest we forget, like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in
Afghanistan, Saddam Hussein was put into power by a CIA-engineered
coup to stop the Iraqi people's revolution--which he did with US &
Western support by massacring socialists and the left wing of his
own Baath party. But Saddam, instead of obediently kowtowing to the
wishes of his mentors in Washington, had his own vision and agenda
for his country. Instead of opening Iraq to free-market
capital penetration on terms that were thoroughly favorable to
Western and US interests, he devoted a substantial portion of Iraq's
export earnings to basic services and economic development. An
independent Western journalist told me that Iraqis enjoy free
medical care and free education. In 1972, Iraq nationalized
its oil industry, and was immediately denounced by the US and
Western countries as a "terrorist nation."
As a leading member and major funder to the United Nations,
the United States is expected to practice consistency in its foreign
policy. Several years ago, when the United Nations issued
resolutions for Israel to withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza
Strip, which Israel continues to blatantly defy, did the
United States send in the Marines to "discipline" its ally to whom
it supplies and sells weapons to the tune of no less than US$3
billion a year? We have yet to hear a condemnation of "terrorism" by
the United States against Israel whenever that country rains
US-manufactured rockets and artillery on Palestinian civilians in
their refugee camps. Why does the United States continue to train
and sell weapons to the armed forces of Turkey which is widely known
to perpetuate a policy of genocide against the Kurdish people in its
territory? And why doesn't the do-gooder America not also
train its guns on the rulers of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates
and Kuwait (to whom it now exports the largest amounts of weapons)
who are known to grossly violate the human rights of their people,
especially their women?
This is really about America's oil fields overseas, and
for the bankbooks of the American defense and armaments
manufacturers. Again, lest we forget.
Why then, must we wage peace? We must wage peace
because wars have always been against humanity. Wars and hatred
reproduce more wars and hatred. If Sept. 11 is a lesson at all even
for the biggest superpower on earth, it is that civilian populations
are the most vulnerable to ANY war and conflict. And even with only
its arsenal of hi-tech "efficient" and "smart" bombs today, the
United States which has the largest arsenal of nuclear, chemical and
biological weapons in the world, could just flatten the entire Iraqi
nation, not just Saddam Hussein. Consider the United States'
non-nuclear, non-chemical weapons it just recently tested against
the Al-Qaeda, the Taliban and Afghan civilians killed in Afghanistan
(according to New York City's Village Voice, Sept. 4-10, 2002
issue):
"1.Fuel air explosives: Big, horrific bombs, these send
out a volatile mist that spreads through any opening -- a doorway
into a building or underground bunker or, as at Tora Bora, a cave.
The bomb then detonates, its explosion rocketing through underground
passages.
"2. Daisy cutters-- Used in Afghanistan last winter;
these 15,000-pound monsters wipe out everything in a 300-feet
radius. The bomb will not only literally break you apart besides
making you catch fire; the shock wave is so powerful that it crushes
your internal organs.
"3. Microwave weapons : Supposedly non-lethal crowd
controllers, these beam-blasting transmitters can cause third-degree
burns. In combat, the weapons might be used to clear urban
riots, but their power source is cumbersome, which might prohibit
using them.
"4. Cluster bombs: Tossing these sweethearts around has
been likened to laying a minefield from 15,000 feet."
Now we know why a famous World War I movie, "ALL QUIET
ON THE WESTERN FRONT" became one of the most famous anti-war films
of the 20th century.
September 24, 2002
* Article by Roland G Simbulan - For a full professional background
of Professor Roland G. Simbulan (Click
Here)
|