
COTANGENT - Articles by Daphne Cardillo |
|
COTANGENT
By Daphne Cardillo
Marcos Revisited
If
we look back and reflect, Marcos still is the greatest president that we
have ever had. Much as we
would like to assign evils to his strongman rule and its inherent
repression, that era of rigidity paved the way for 21st
century
First, it railroaded history.
If
we trace back the pace of our country’s movement towards autonomy and
independence, it might take another century for us to arrive where we
are now. Since the early
1900s, the pull from being a colony to a neo-colony in all spheres of
our national life has been slow and ambivalent – atras abante.
The history of accommodations, complacency and compromises in
government and politics only prolonged the pain of growth towards real
autonomy and independence.
When Martial Law was declared, dictatorship was given full force
reaching contempt. Foreign
intervention in national governance was more insidious – colonization
without occupation. The
American way of life and western culture was lumped in our throats.
Multinational companies flooded our land and shores.
And the peso rapidly depreciated its face value.
Only then did the Filipino people realize the meaning of sovereignty and
independence. Thus, out
with the
Second, it gave rise to a nationalist perspective and acts of
self-determination among our people.
The concentration of power in government rose to its height and again
reaching contempt. Like
simple fractions, the Filipino people were reduced to their lowest
terms. To top it all, the
Aquino assassination erased all hope among our people for a leader that
would challenge Marcos.
This proved to be a turning point.
The people finally lost trust in government.
Now with nothing to depend on, our people started looking inward and
trusting themselves.
Organizations and cause-oriented groups mushroomed and later bloomed to
full expression at the Edsa revolution.
Yet even with the change of government and a mother figure at the
helm, our people cannot anymore forego the power that they have
generated among themselves.
Thus we see the refinement in people empowerment in people’s
organization (
If
we look into the participants at these attempts at self-determination we
see a new breed of Filipinos who are defining themselves in their
respective milieu, knowing their strengths and weaknesses, setting goals
and limits in their own ways and gradually changing the course of our
national destiny. Our POs
and NGOs extend to a wide area of concern; from income generation,
health education, cultural reorientation, social and political
amelioration, and environmental protection.
Thus, a new kind of citizenry is born.
Third, it polarized Philippine society.
On
the political spectrum, our people were pulled either to the extreme of
left or to the extreme of right.
On the economic side, the gap between the rich and the poor has
widened exposing the rich in their abundance and the poor in their want.
While on the social sphere, the cultural minorities were
marginalized, the political dissenters silenced and the Muslims
radicalized. That era of
martial rule magnified the glaring injustices, inequalities, and
irregularities in Philippine society.
Thus, the clamor for structural and institutional change raged on
-- and the struggle continues.
Indeed, people and events may have a reason for coming into being.
And for us a passive and dependent lot, Marcos did the dirty job
of knocking our heads, squeezing our blood, tearing our hearts and souls
so we may stand up and fight fiercely for our right to be free.
_________________________________
|
| © Articles in this section are copyright of Daphne Cardillo |